Header logo
Log in
Listing Blogs Generic

What the Brazel case means for self-employed workers

Last week, the Supreme Court handed down its judgement in Harpur Trust v Brazel.

While the case hasn’t been widely reported in the media, the Supreme Court’s ruling will have significant consequences for certain workers. In particular, the unanimous decision from the Court will impact how employers calculate annual leave, with umbrella companies likely to be impacted.

Author default profile picture
Eva Petrova
27 Jul 2022
3 minutes
Share

The case highlights once again the urgent need for the rules surrounding holiday pay to be clarified.

What is Harpur Trust V Brazel?

Harpur Trust V Brazel involved Ms Brazel, a music teacher who works during term-time (part-year) and the Harpur Trust, a charity that manages a number of private schools in Bedford.

In this case, Ms Brazel believed that her holiday pay should be calculated using her average earnings over a 12-week period and not pro-rated. She argued that she lost out on annual leave after the school she worked at changed the way it calculated her holiday pay in 2011. The Harpur Trust calculated her earnings at the end of each term, took 12.07% of that figure, and then paid Ms Brazel her hourly rate for that number of hours as holiday pay. That 12.07% is the proportion that 5.6 weeks of annual leave bears to the total working year of 46.4 weeks.

The Trust argued to the court that it could pro-rate her holiday entitlement and pay, to reflect the fact that she worked fewer weeks per year than comparable full-time staff.

While the Trust’s method of calculating part-time workers’ holiday pay is widely used and was recommended by HR bodies such as ACAS, Ms Brazel argued that the Harpur Trust weren’t compliant with Working Time Regulations 1998. The law states that part-year workers shouldn’t be entitled to less holiday pay than their full-year counterparts.

The verdict

Before the case went to the Supreme Court, it was heard by the Court of Appeal. The Court supported Ms Brazel and stated that workers on permanent part-year contacts must receive at least 5.6 weeks of holiday pay, on the basis that holiday could not be pro-rated because the Working Time Regulations 1998 do not include a pro-rata principle in these circumstances.

It was then taken to the Supreme Court. The Court agreed with the Court of Appeal and concluded that Brazel was treated unfairly for being a part-year worker.

So what does this mean for umbrella workers?

The Harpur Trust v Brazel ruling means that part-year workers are entitled to the same holiday pay as those working full-year. The verdict marks a turning point in how businesses - and in particular umbrella companies - calculate their holiday pay. It throws out the old 12.07% method.

Holiday pay has been at the centre of several disputes recently. The rules are relatively clear for full-time employees, but, as this case highlights, it becomes considerably murkier where people are working outside of this traditional employment structure.

There are long-standing concerns surrounding the treatment of holiday pay by umbrella companies. IPSE has called for this to be urgently addressed to ensure individuals receive their full entitlement in all circumstances. The Brazel case on its own will not solve these issues but it does shine a light on what is and isn’t considered ‘fair’. We hope that it will prompt regulators to issue comprehensive guidance on holiday pay, so that everyone, including umbrella workers, understands what their entitlement is, and gets it.

Latest self-employed news and opinions

From new year to year end is tax planning on your to do list 2
From new year to year-end – is tax planning on your to-do list?
+1 more

As 2025 begins, proactive tax planning is key for self-employed professionals ahead of the April 5 year-end. While there’s no Spring Budget, important updates and...

10 Feb 2025
Author default profile picture
Chase de Vere
Incubator How to start a business in 30 days
Kickstart your freelance career: introducing the IPSE Incubator
+2 more

The IPSE Incubator provides essential tools and practical advice to those looking to become self-employed, the newly self-employed, or even anyone just wanting a ...

04 Feb 2025
About us simpler
IPSE
Is casual freelancing paving the path for a self employed recovery
Is casual freelancing paving the path for a self-employed recovery?
+2 more

IPSE's Joshua Toovey reviews how an increase in side hustles as well as the number of working mums is driving a self-employed recovery.

23 Jan 2025
Josh Toovey Headshot
Josh Toovey
IPSE-LOGO-HEADER

Join our newsletter

Registered in England and Wales, no 03770926. Lynton House, 7-12 Tavistock Square, London WC1H 9LT